The democratic process can be divided into two phases: peer debate and decision-making. But what are the necessary characteristics of a good decision-maker? This is the question that author Giulia Sissa tried to answer, in discussion with philosopher Annarosa Buttarelli, during Festivaletteratura 2023 in Mantua's marvellous Bibiena theatre.

Going all the way back to ancient Greece, the two women analysed historical perceptions of democracy and politics. The idea of power to the people has been restricted since democracy began: historically women had no place in the assembly, because they were considered weak and incapable of decision-making. A good politician, in order to be good and quick at making decision for the community, must be strong, brave, but, most importantly, manly.

However, Sissa highlighted theatre as exposing deep-rooted contradictions in the ancient societies that opted to exclude women from power. Even the most misogynistic writers, such as Aristotle, could not resist the determination and intelligence of great characters such as Antigone. Aristotle’s approach has been highly valued and applied in Western societies throughout history, and especially during the Middle Ages. During this era, women were not only considered incapable of decision-making, but also irrational and emotionally unstable. The medieval interpretation destroys the image of strong, intelligent women able to foresee the future consequences of political actions found in Greek theatre.

These days, women's place in Western societies and participation in politics is far from perfect, but it has made incredible progress since ancient times, Sissa maintains. It is important to remember the history behind the freedoms that today are taken for granted, important not to forget ancient mistakes. There is still much to be done, but at least women in most societies have a place and a voice in the decision-making process: the possibility of being elected and the right to vote.